At a time when global trade is fragmenting into blocs and alliances are strained by protectionism, Ottawa has chosen pragmatism over orthodoxy. By agreeing to sharply reduce tariffs on Chinese EVs in exchange for relief on Canadian agricultural exports — especially canola — Canada has signalled that economic survival sometimes demands uncomfortable choices. But Canada’s recent decision to strike an electric-vehicle (EV) trade arrangement with China,  has consequences that stretch far beyond trade balances as it will  also impact provincial politics, relations with Washington, and the future of Canada’s industrial identity.

Canada’s agriculture sector has long been collateral damage in diplomatic standoffs with China. Canola farmers have endured years of restricted access to one of their largest markets. The reopening of that door was not merely symbolic; it was existential. For Ottawa, continuing to absorb agricultural losses in the name of geopolitical alignment was becoming politically unsustainable.

The EV concession, therefore, is not ideological. It is transactional. Canada lowered its guard on Chinese EV — within limits and quotas — to secure immediate economic relief for a sector that had run out of patience. In doing so, it acknowledged a reality that policymakers often avoid admitting: moral posturing is easier when it does not come at a direct economic cost.

At the federal level, the deal has been framed as balance — diversification without capitulation. Officials argue that Canada cannot afford to tie its economic future entirely to the United States, particularly as American trade policy grows more inward-looking and unpredictable. In this reading, engaging China selectively is not betrayal but insurance.

No province has reacted more sharply than Ontario, where the automotive industry remains both an economic pillar and a political touchstone. Unionized labor forms a tightly woven ecosystem that depends heavily on access to the U.S. market and protection from unfair competition.

Ontario’s leadership fears that even a controlled inflow of low-cost Chinese EVs could destabilise this ecosystem. The concern is not volume alone, but precedent. Once the door is opened — even slightly — it becomes harder to argue for its closure later. Provincial leaders worry that domestic manufacturers, already under pressure from rising costs and technological transition, may find themselves competing with state-subsidised giants operating on an entirely different scale.

Behind the rhetoric lies a deeper anxiety  that Canada’s long-promised EV manufacturing renaissance may never materialise if the market is flooded too early with cheaper imports. For provinces that have invested political capital and public money in courting battery plants and auto investments, the deal feels like a gamble taken without their consent.

No analysis of Canadian trade policy is complete without considering the United States.   Supply chains cross borders seamlessly, particularly in the automotive sector, where vehicles and components may cross the frontier multiple times before completion.

Washington’s discomfort with Canada’s EV deal is therefore unsurprising. The United States has taken a hard line against Chinese electric vehicles, viewing them not only as economic competitors but as strategic instruments of state policy. From Washington’s perspective, a softer Canadian stance risks creating loopholes — real or perceived — in North America’s defensive trade wall.

Yet America’s response has been cautious rather than confrontational. This restraint reflects reality. The U.S. needs Canada — for energy security, continental defence, and climate cooperation. Overreaction would risk destabilising one of its most dependable alliances.

Even so, the decision leaves a subtle but unmistakable tension in the air. Ottawa is reminded that stepping out from Washington’s shadow, even carefully, carries real consequences. Every move toward trade diversification has a diplomatic cost, and even small departures from U.S. expectations draw scrutiny. Canada now finds itself on a narrow ledge, trying to reassure its closest ally while holding on to the freedom to act in its own economic interest.

Beyond the boardrooms and policy briefings, the effects are felt most sharply everyday by  Canadians. Through the lens of climate policy, the stakes are high. More affordable EV could accelerate emissions reductions and make clean transportation attainable not just for wealthy urban residents, but for families and communities across Canada.  In this narrow sense, the deal aligns with Canada’s environmental ambitions more convincingly than many domestic subsidies ever have.

But this benefit carries its own contradictions. Cheaper imports may weaken domestic innovation, discouraging investment in Canada’s manufacturing sector. It is a paradox at the heart of the agreement: it advances sustainability while potentially compromising the economic foundations that make that progress possible.

Canada’s relationship with China in recent years has been defined more by tension than by reconciliation. Diplomatic stand-offs, retaliatory trade measures, and deep-seated mistrust have left scars that a single agreement cannot erase. The EV deal does not erase this history; nor does it signal trust. It signals fatigue.

Beijing, for its part, sees opportunity. Re-entering the Canadian market, even in a limited capacity, helps normalise Chinese technology and manufacturing at a time when it faces exclusion elsewhere.

Canada’s decision on electric vehicles reveals a broader reality for middle powers in a world dominated by great-power rivalry. Principles do  matter, but influence also  matters more. Countries , which are  without the economic clout of the United States or China should steer carefully.

The deal is neither a triumph nor a surrender. It is a calculated risk taken in an unforgiving global environment. Whether it pays off will depend on what follows — investment in domestic industry, protection for workers, transparency in implementation, and steady diplomacy with allies.

Share

The post Canada -China deal : strategic gamble in a shifting global order appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

Guangdong’s construction centre has shut down all classes, office work and public transport once in a while due to rising water and the threat of landslides in the area.

Around five lakh people’s homes have been damaged in the neighbouring state of Jiangxi and their lives are in danger. Considerable damage has also been reported in the cities of Shaoguan, Heyuan and Meizhou in Guangdong. Roads have been broken in some parts of the city due to heavy rains. Rescue crews in Zhejiang evacuated people trapped in the water by boats.

Share

The post South China floods force tens of thousands to evacuate appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

Responding to a question by the state-run Chinese media on the protests against the alleged comments made by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said, “We have looked into the relevant reports. We hope that the incident concerned can be properly dealt with,” he said, adding that it is important to give up arrogance and prejudice and everyone should respect each other’s religions.

On June 5, the BJP had suspended its national spokesperson Nupur Sharma and expelled its Delhi unit’s media chief Naveen Kumar Jindal for his alleged remarks on Prophet Mohammed. Amid protests from Muslim groups over the remarks, the party had issued a statement aimed at addressing the concerns of minorities, saying it respected all religions.

Share

The post China reacts on row over remarks on Prophet Muhammad, ‘Important to abandon arrogance and prejudice’ appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

The minister said that apart from the above five products, the DGTR has recommended imposition of anti-dumping duty on other products originating in or exported from China PR in 2021-22.

Meanwhile, the move was initiated to apprehend if domestic industry has been hurt by a rise in low cost imports.

Share

The post To protect local manufacturers: India imposes anti dumping duty on Chinese products appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

The Tribunal will issue the reasons for its finding on March 7, 2022, officials said in a statement.

The Tribunal is an independent quasi-judicial body that reports to Parliament through the Minister of Finance. It hears cases on dumped and subsidized imports, safeguard complaints, complaints about federal government procurement and appeals of lp

Share

The post CBSA Initiates New Dumping and Subsidy Investigation into Container Chassis from China appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

ਵਾਇਰਸ ਦੀ ਪੈਦਾਇਸ਼ ਦੀ ਜਾਂਚ ਕਰ ਰਹੇ ਸੀਐੱਨਐੱਨ ਦੇ ਮੁਤਾਬਕ, ਡਬਲਯੂਐੱਚਓ ਦੇ ਵਿਗਿਆਨੀਆਂ ਨੇ ਅਗਲੀ ਜਾਂਚ ਲਈ ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਖੇਤਰਾਂ ਦੀ ਪਛਾਣ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ । ਉਸ ਸਮੇਂ ਆਲਮੀ ਮਾਹਰਾਂ ਦਾ ਧਿਆਨ ਇਸ ‘ਤੇ ਬਹੁਤ ਘੱਟ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ। ਹਾਲਾਂਕਿ ਟੀਮ ਦੇ ਚੀਨ ਜਾਣ ਦੀ ਕੋਈ ਤਰੀਕ ਅਜੇ ਤੈਅ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਈ, ਪਰ ਸੂਤਰਾਂ ਦਾ ਕਹਿਣਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਛੋਟੇ ਸਮੂਹ ਉੱਥੇ ਜਾ ਸਕਦੇ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਉਸ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਇਕ ਵੱਡਾ ਸਮੂਹ ਜਾ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ ਜਿਵੇਂ ਜਨਵਰੀ ‘ਚ 17 ਕੌਮਾਂਤਰੀ ਮਾਹਰ ਉੱਥੇ ਗਏ ਸਨ।

 ਕੋਰੋਨਾ ਵਾਇਰਸ ਦੇ ਉਭਾਰ ਸਮੇਂ ਹੀ ਦਸੰਬਰ, 2019 ‘ਚ ਇਨਫਲੁਏਂਜਾ ਦਾ ਜ਼ਿਕਰਯੋਗ ਪਸਾਰ ਤੇ ਇਸ ਗੱਲ ਦੇ ਤੱਥ ਸ਼ਾਮਲ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਵਾਇਰਸ ਨਾਲ ਇਨਫੈਕਟਿਡ ਹੋਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤੀ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦਾ ਦਸੰਬਰ ‘ਚ ਕੁਲ 28 ਵੱਖ-ਵੱਖ ਖ਼ੁਰਾਕੀ ਤੇ ਪਸ਼ੂ ਬਾਜ਼ਾਰਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਸੰਪਰਕ ਸੀ। ਵ੍ਹਾਈਟ ਹਾਊਸ ਦੇ ਕੋਰੋਨਾ ਸਲਾਹਕਾਰ ਐਂਡੀ ਸਲੈਵਿਟ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਨੂੰ ਕੋਰੋਨਾ ਦੀ ਪੈਦਾਇਸ਼ ਦਾ ਪਤਾ ਲਗਾਉਣ ਦੀ ਜ਼ਰੂਰਤ ਹੈ। ਬਾਇਡਨ ਪ੍ਰਸ਼ਾਸਨ ਦੇ ਮੈਡੀਕਲ ਸਲਾਹਕਾਰ ਡਾ. ਐਂਥਨੀ ਫਾਸੀ ਨੂੰ ਲੱਗਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਨੂੰ ਇਸ ਸੰਦਰਭ ‘ਚ ਜਾਂਚ ਜਾਰੀ ਰੱਖਣੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਡਬਲਯੂਐੱਚਓ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਕੀਤੀ ਗਈ ਜਾਂਚ ਨੂੰ ਅਗਲੇ ਗੇੜ ‘ਚ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਜਾਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ। ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਦੇ ਸਾਬਕਾ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ ਮੰਤਰੀ ਮਾਈਕ ਪੋਂਪੀਓ ਨੇ ਤਾਂ ਦਾਅਵਾ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਹਰ ਸਬੂਤ ਇਸ਼ਾਰਾ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕੋਰੋਨਾ ਵਾਇਰਸ ਵੁਹਾਨ ਇੰਸਟੀਚਿਊਟ ਆਫ ਵਾਇਰੋਲਾਜੀ ਤੋਂ ਲੀਕ ਹੋਇਆ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਚੀਨ ਦੀ ਕਮਿਊਨਿਸਟ ਪਾਰਟੀ ਨੂੰ ਇਸ ਲਈ ਜ਼ਿੰਮੇਵਾਰ ਠਹਿਰਾਇਆ ਜਾਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ।

Share

The post WHO ਦਾ ਨਵਾਂ ਫੈਸਲਾ : ਕੋਰੋਨਾ ਵਾਇਰਸ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਅਤੇ ਕਿੱਥੇ ਹੋਇਆ ਸੀ ਤਿਆਰ ? ਚੀਨ ਫਿਰ ਕੜਿੱਕੀ ‘ਚ appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.