I want to start with a confession.

I built trading bots that my community relies on every day. I’ve spent more hours than I can count debugging alert logic, fixing duplicate signals, tuning parameters, and rebuilding systems from scratch when they broke in ways I didn’t anticipate. I believe in what I’ve built.

And I still make bad trades.

Not because the tools don’t work. They work. But because somewhere between the alert firing and my finger hitting the button, I stopped being a systematic trader and became a human being with opinions, emotions, a position that was already down, and a completely irrational certainty that this next one was going to recover everything.

The tools didn’t fail me in those moments. I failed myself. And I’ve watched enough traders in my community make the same mistake often enough to know that what I’m about to say is the conversation the AI trading tools industry is actively avoiding — because it doesn’t help them sell subscriptions.

So let’s have it.

The alert is not the trade

This sounds obvious. It isn’t, apparently.

I built my swing bot to scan multiple timeframes, identify setups based on criteria I defined when I was calm and thinking clearly, and push alerts to my Discord. It does that job well. But I’ve sat in live sessions and watched members receive an alert and enter a position within seconds — no volume check, no broader market context, no consideration of whether they’d already taken two losses that morning and maybe shouldn’t be trading at all.

The bot flagged a setup. They heard a decision.

Those are not the same thing. An alert tells you something worth examining just happened. It says nothing about whether you should act, how large your position should be, what your stop is, or whether this particular day is a good day for you to be pulling triggers at all. A VWAP reclaim on above-average RVOL in the context of a strong sector tape means something different than the same signal on a news-driven spike in a choppy overall market. The bot can’t know that. You have to know that.

This is the gap nobody in the AI tools space wants to talk about. The tools are built to look impressive in demos — fast, confident, clean. What they’re not built to do is slow you down when you should be slowing down. And the moments that cost traders the most money are rarely the ones where they had bad information. They’re the ones where they had good information and moved on it before they’d thought it through.

AI amplifies what you already are

This is the thing I had to learn the expensive way.

There was a stretch where my swing bot’s signal quality was genuinely good — the setups it was flagging were clean, the follow-through was there, and the logic held up. And my account still underperformed during that period. Not because of the bot. Because I was also day trading separately, making impulsive entries on tickers that had nothing to do with my system, averaging into losers, ignoring the rules I’d set for myself and justifying every single exception in the moment.

The bot was doing its job. I wasn’t doing mine.

What that experience clarified — painfully, over multiple sessions — is that an AI tool is not a floor that catches you when you’re trading badly. It’s a multiplier on whatever you’re already doing. If your discipline is solid, your risk management is consistent, and you’re genuinely following a process, the right tool can sharpen your edge in real ways. If you’re chasing, overtrading, letting losses make you reckless — the tool just helps you do all of that with more information and faster execution.

I have a rule I keep for myself: by 10:30 AM on Fridays, I’m out of everything. No new entries. The week is done. It took a while to build that discipline. No bot gave it to me. I built it because I’d seen too many times what happened when I didn’t have it.

Rules like that — the ones you make when you’re clear-headed and enforce when you’re not — are the real edge. The tool is secondary to the trader running it.

What these tools are actually good for

I don’t want to be all doom about it, because there’s genuine value here if you understand what you’re working with.

The honest case for AI trading tools comes down to three things.

Consistency. My system runs the same scan in hour four of a session as it ran at open — same criteria, same logic, same output. I don’t. By mid-afternoon, I’m tired, I’ve already made decisions I’m second-guessing, and my pattern recognition is quietly degrading in ways I can’t fully perceive in the moment. The bot doesn’t have that problem. It doesn’t have a bad day. In a domain where emotional fatigue kills performance, that’s nothing.

Coverage. I physically cannot watch 200 tickers across multiple time frames simultaneously and catch every relevant setup. The bot can. It misses nothing on its watchlist, which means I catch opportunities I would have missed and pass on noise I would have rationalized into something.

Record-keeping. Every alert my system generates is logged. Every condition that triggered it is documented. Over time, that data becomes something genuinely valuable — an honest performance record, stripped of the selective memory that leads most traders to overestimate their win rate because they remember the good trades more vividly than the bad ones. Automated systems don’t have selective memory. Mine has shown me setups I thought were working that weren’t, and setups I’d been dismissing that were consistently cleaner than I’d given them credit for.

All of that is real. None of it decides for you.

A word on bad products

I know traders who have been burned badly enough by AI tools that they’ve written off the whole category. Some of those experiences were completely legitimate — there are genuinely bad products in this space. Backtests built on look-ahead bias. Parameters curve-fitted to a specific period of market history that fall apart the moment conditions change. Marketing copy that implies a documented edge the underlying system has never actually demonstrated in live conditions.

Healthy skepticism toward specific products is rational. Dismissing everything because one tool was garbage is like avoiding all cars because one had faulty brakes.

The right question about any tool isn’t “can AI work in trading” — the evidence that systematic, data-driven approaches generate an edge is extensive and goes back decades. The right question is whether this specific tool, built on this specific logic, by these specific people, actually does what it claims when real money is on the line. Ask for a live track record. Not a backtest. A live track record, with drawdowns, with losing streaks, with all the ugly periods included.

If they don’t have one, or won’t show you one, that’s your answer.

The part nobody wants to hear

AI is not going to make trading easier.

The market at the margin is zero-sum. The participants on the other side of your trades are also using AI — many of them with better data, more compute, lower latency, and teams of quants who do nothing else. Retail AI tools don’t close that gap. They never will.

What they can do, in the right hands, is make you more consistent. More disciplined. Better at identifying the setups that actually fit your process and filtering out the ones that don’t. That’s real, and for the kind of systematic swing and position trading where I do my best work, it genuinely matters.

But it only works if you show up as the trader the system needs you to be. Not the trader who sees an alert and goes straight to the order ticket. Not the trader who blames the bot when a setup doesn’t follow through. The trader who built the rules understands why they exist and has enough self-awareness to know when they’re about to break them.

I built the tools. I still have to do that work.

So do you.

—

*Jinlu Wang is AI Editorial Strategist with Ubiq Broadcasting Corp, builds automated trading systems and web applications for financial markets. She runs Harp’s Trading, a paid investment research and trading community, and publishes institutional-style research covering AI infrastructure, energy, and commodity-linked technology themes.*

Share

The post What Retail Traders Get Wrong About AI Tools — From Someone Who Built Them appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

Speaking after the signing, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, noted that this is his third interaction with his Australian counterpart in last one month. He conveyed his appreciation for the leadership of the Prime Minister Morrison and the efforts of his Trade Envoy and former Prime Minister of Australia Tony Abbott. He also commended the Trade Ministers and their team for a successful and effective engagement.

Modi said that signing of IndAus ECTA in such a short span of time reflects the depth of the mutual confidence between the two countries.

“This is a watershed moment for our bilateral relations”, he emphasized. The Prime Minister said “On the basis of this agreement, together, we will be able to increase the resilience of supply chains, and also contribute to the stability of the Indo-Pacific region.”

Terming ‘people to people’ relations as the key pillar of the relationship between India and Australia, the Prime Minister said “This agreement will facilitate the exchange of students, professionals, and tourists between us, which will further strengthen these relations.”The Prime Minister also conveyed his wishes to the women cricket team of Australia for upcoming World Cup final.

Meanwhile, growing India-Australia economic and commercial relations contribute to the stability and strength of a rapidly diversifying and deepening relationship between the two countries. The IndAus ECTA, encompassing trade in goods and services, is a balanced and equitable trade agreement, which will further cement the already deep, close and strategic relations between the two countries and will significantly enhance the bilateral trade in goods and services, create new employment opportunities, raise living standards and improve the general welfare of the peoples of the two countries.

Share

The post India, Australia sign economic deal to deepen trade ties, PM Modi says ‘watershed moment’ appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

The minister said that apart from the above five products, the DGTR has recommended imposition of anti-dumping duty on other products originating in or exported from China PR in 2021-22.

Meanwhile, the move was initiated to apprehend if domestic industry has been hurt by a rise in low cost imports.

Share

The post To protect local manufacturers: India imposes anti dumping duty on Chinese products appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

The Summit follows the historic first Virtual Summit of 4 June 2020 when the relationship was elevated to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.

During the upcoming virtual summit, the Leaders will take stock of progress made on various initiatives under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. The virtual summit will lay the way forward on new initiatives and enhanced cooperation in a diverse range of sectors between India and Australia.

The Leaders are expected to commit to closer cooperation in trade, critical minerals, migration and mobility, and education, among others.

Views on regional and international issues of mutual interest will also be discussed by the Leaders. The Summit highlights the importance attached by both countries to their bilateral relations as also their close cooperation on regional and global issues.

The India-Australia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership has maintained the momentum of an upward trajectory with both countries continuing to collaborate closely, despite the Covid-19 pandemic, in wide-ranging areas including science and technology, defence, cyber, critical and strategic materials, water resource management, as well as public administration and governance.

Prime Minister Modi and Prime Minister Morrison met in Washington DC for the first in-person meeting after the Covid-19 pandemic in September 2021 on the margins of the Quad Leaders’ Summit and jointly launched the Infrastructure for Resilient Island States (IRIS) in Glasgow on the margins of the COP26 in November 2021.

Share

The post Second India-Australia Virtual Summit: Morrison and PM Modi to discuss trade ties appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.

He expressed this after leaving for Moscow in an pre-visit interview and that he would love to hold a debate with PM Modi on TV.

He said that with this over a billion people in the subcontinent would benefit if the debate managed to resolve differences.

Pakistan PM said that India has become a hostile nation therefore trade with them dwindled.

Meanwhile, there is no response from India to this offer yet.

Reacting on the development, senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor tweeted, “Dear @ImranKhanPTI, agree that “jaw-jaw is better than war-war”, but no issues are ever resolved in Indian television debates, only exacerbated! https://t.co/G8hlQ5hGjR And some of our anchors would be happy to ignite tWorld War III if it would increase their TRPs.”

Share

The post ‘Would love to debate with Narendra Modi on television’: Pakistan PM Imran Khan appeared first on TV Punjab | English News Channel.